It’s superb how nuanced obituaries might be for figures that liberal media varieties respect. The portrait is at all times sophisticated. However much less so when it’s a conservative. Conservative radio star Rush Limbaugh handed away this week and The New York Instances slammed him with an obit about “hate,” “distrust” and grievances.” The net model featured a sub-headline sliming him as “pushing discuss radio to the proper with misogynistic and racist language and conspiracy theories.”
When conservative Supreme Court docket icon Antonin Scalia died, right here’s the dour, detrimental headline from the February 14, 2016 print Washington Publish:
As I questioned on the time, what was an important factor for readers of Washington Publish to see on the front-page of the paper? An enormous headline focusing instantly on the legacy or influence of the lifetime of Antonin Scalia? No, simply that liberals didn’t take care of him. Here is the entrance web page when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died:
When merciless terrorist Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi died in 2019, the Publish was a lot nicer to him than Scalia, calling the killer an “austere non secular scholar.”
However when Fidel Castro died, The New York Instances cheered, “A Revolutionary Who Defied the U.S. and Held Cuba in His Thrall.” The Publish remembered how the “Revolutionary Remade Cuba.”
The lesson in all of that is that once you die, it’s higher to be a liberal, a far-left dictator or a terrorist than a conservative. In accordance with shops like The Washington Publish and New York Instances anyway.
For extra examples from our flashback sequence, which we name the NewsBusters Time Machine, go right here.